The Duct Tape
’s Lawsuit and Buying a UN Resolution –
all while Rumsfeld arms Pygmies and
’s corporate cronies walk free.
Got a grip yet?
By Michael I. Niman ArtVoice March 6th, 2003
Wouldn’t you know it?
There’s a duct tape magnate. His
name is Jack Kahl. He lives in
, and his company produces 46% of all the duct tape consumed in the
. Which means they produce, more or
less, 46% of all that extra duct tape stressed-out Americans dutifully bought
last month after Bush Administration Secretary of
told us to. Jack’s son John, heir
to the duct tape fortune, recently reported sales increases of 100% to 200%,
“particularly in certain metro markets and around the coasts and borders.”
Given that the company grossed $300 million in 2001, such an increase
represents, well, a lot of money. Suffice
to say it’s probably a lot more than the $100,000 ‘ol Jack donated to the
Republican Party in 2000.
What am I saying here?
Do you think that I think the whole duct tape fiasco was just about
generating a few dozen million dollars for a loyal Republican crony?
That we all made fools of ourselves mobbing our local Home Depots just to
line a few pockets and raise a few campaign dollars for the next election cycle?
Not really. The notion is
just too ridiculous – but then again these are ridiculous times.
If you asked me a year ago if I would ever have thought Americans would
run out en mass to buy duct tape, naively believing the otherwise handy basement
stalwart would protect us from chemical, biological and nuclear attack, I’d
think the question ridiculous. But
alas, here we are – reliving shades of Duck and Cover, the 1950s era
government education campaign that compared a nuclear attack to a bad sunburn
and advised children us to hide under school desks when the big one hit.
The recent upgrade to code orange terror alert wasn’t
about protecting us – it was about terrorizing us.
Duct [tape] and Cover is no different than Duck and Cover.
With the exception of Jack and John Kahl, Duct Tape isn’t going to
really do much for anyone – except lead to a few random suffocation deaths.
Maybe it was a joke – “Hey Jack, this week we’ll tell them to all
buy Duct Tape, tee hee hee. – Next week we’ll tell them to stock up on Coca
Cola.” More likely, it was all
about raising the fear level, emphasizing code orange in the face of
international peace protests. Don’t
fly, don’t move, don’t go to
, and don’t protest. It was the
code orange “threat,” after all, according a federal judge, which provided
the legal rationale for not granting a permit to
’s massive peace march. Of course,
now that the Saint Patrick’s Day parade is coming up, the threat level is
being lowered to yellow – as in OK to march.
Which brings up the question, what to do with all that extra duct tape?
My suggestion: wrap your tee vee. Wrap
it up good and tight.
What Weapons of
Talk about a tough defense – try this on for size.
The Bush administration is center stage all over the world, contradicting
just about every eyewitness, weapons inspector, and intelligence agency –
including our own – droning on about how
is stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.
At the same time, pity the poor lawyer currently representing the
, who has to argue the opposite case, playing down
’s weapons of mass destruction program. This
is what lawyers must call bad timing. A
1992 suit leveled by
for supplying chemical, biological and nuclear weapons to
during that country’s war with
is finally being heard. The
is being taken to task by the Iranians for its Reagan/Bush era alliance with
, when it supplied
with the very weapons the new Bush administration now insists they have.
The Iranians, for their part, insist on holding both the US
and Iraq responsible for war crimes committed by Hussein’s government while
using US supplied weapons of mass destruction.
Under US law, both Reagan and Bush Senior would be as guilty as Saddam,
both being accomplices to a capital crime. That’s,
er, a very capital crime.
Of course Reagan and Bush Senior had accomplices.
We now know that at least 24 major
corporations are accused of selling banned material to Saddam Hussein’s
government in order to help build his weapons of mass destruction program during
the Iraq-Iran war. The list includes
household names such as Honeywell, Unisys, Sperry, Rockwell, Hewlett-Packard,
Dupont, Kodak, EZ Logic and Bechtel.
While I’m not going to hold my breath waiting for any
executives of these corporations to do the perp-walk any time soon, the question
does arise, why the hell not? If the
supposed rationale for Bush’s planned war is to rid Iraq of weapons of mass
destruction, which by all accounts are currently in check or gone, then isn’t
it logical that we should prosecute the very criminals who illegally and without
any moral compunction supplied lethal weapons to a genocidal murderer with a
track record for using them on innocent civilians?
Hello?!? Doesn’t any action other than arresting and prosecuting those
supposedly sane business people who knowingly armed a supposed madman expose the
hypocrisy behind this war?
The FBI, however, isn’t investigating
’s corporate collaborators – they’re too busy in rural
Central New York
interrogating pacifist Quakers and Peace activists who are under investigation
for possibly donating money to charities feeding starving Iraqi children.
According to John Ashcroft, such donations constitute a violation of the
Treasury Department’s “Trading With the Enemy” statutes. Giving the
“enemy” weapons of mass destruction, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to be
a problem. And doubling your
purchase of Iraqi crude oil, as a host of US companies have done during the past
three months, also doesn’t seem to violate the law.
But of course Kodak and company were just engaging in the
time honored American tradition of making money, just as they were when Kodak,
Ford, GM and a host of other corporations were supplying the Nazis.
We didn’t prosecute them then, and we’re not going to prosecute them
now. And if the war goes well,
Exxon-Mobil and a host of other corporations with close ties to the Bush
administration will continue this time honored tradition of making the best out
of a bad situation, as they march over a sea of fresh corpses into
, hell-bent on exploiting the spoils of war.
Rummy and the
Evil Pygmy Empire
Then there’s Donald Rumsfeld.
He was at the center of the Reagan/Bush and Bush Senior efforts to arm
. He went to
and met with Saddam Hussein at about the same time Hussein was gassing both
Kurds and Iranians. It’s no wonder he was recently ceremoniously disowned by
his extended family in
. Rumsfeld seems to be amassing a
reputation for strange relationships with what his boss calls, the “Axis of
Evil.” While Rumsfeld’s former
alliance with Saddam Hussein is old news, his relationship with
’s bizarre government is just beginning to surface.
In 1999 Rumsfeld was a director of the Swiss based nuclear
power giant, ABB, when that company signed a $200 million deal to sell two
nuclear reactors to
. Since then, relations between the
US and North Korea have gone south, mostly because of George W. Bush’s frat
boy rhetoric, calling the North Korean dictator a “pygmy” while labeling his
government part of the “Axis of Evil.” After
putting them on edge, Bush really tweaked the North Koreans by declaring the
evil pygmy empire worthy of a pre-emptive nuclear strike.
Hence, they freaked out, started launching cruise-type missiles into the
Sea of Japan
, and are otherwise just acting badly. Suddenly
Washington is concerned that Rumsfeld’s nukes could be put to “evil” use,
making “dirty bombs” and what not, in what is now becoming old hat for the
insane clown posse in the White House.
Regular readers know that, outside of the
it’s just plain hard to find anyone who supports this war.
Even here in the
, where information is increasingly controlled by a warmongering media, this is
little support, with a host of major American cities passing anti-war resolution
during the past month. In order to
rally support on the UN Security Council, the Bush administration has arrogantly
pushed ahead with an unprecedented campaign of arm-twisting and bribery.
For our European allies, there’s the bait of
’s “soon to be American” oil. You’re
either with us, or shut out of the new imperial American oil market.
America’s chicken-hawks, the Bush administration draft-dodgers and
deserters, now keen on ordering hundreds of thousands of poor and working class
Americans into battle, have threatened what they call “Old Europe” with
economic devastation in a post-Iraq world. “Allies,”
those whores whose price has been met, on the other hand, will be awash in cheap
But the auction for support is more complicated.
The Turks, before allowing American troops to launch an invasion of Iraq
from their territory, have asked for, not only $30 billion in American aid, but
a chunk of Iraq as well. Colin
Powell said the
will only offer a “take it or leave it” deal of $26 billion, but is open to
negotiating what the London Times calls, “the finer details.”
The American media has so far only focused on the monetary demand,
ignoring the finer detail of
’s request to occupy Kurdish Iraq. Of
course, divvying up Iraq at this stage makes the war somewhat transparent, and
of course there are the anti-Saddam forces in Iraq who have sworn to oppose
Turkish occupation with the same relish they oppose Hussein’s government.
At last report, the Turkish Parliament, yielding to the 94% of the
Turkish population that opposes the war, rejected the Bush administration’s
$26 billion bribe.
The Bush administration is also shopping for votes for a UN
resolution legalizing the
. So far they’ve offered
over $10 billion, guaranteeing payment of an otherwise uncollectable Iraqi debt
will get an as of yet not publicly disclosed increase in
will get reduced tariffs on good exported to the
support for their bid to enter the EU as well as military cooperation.
gets a cool billion dollars and a bunch of planes and guns.
gets a billion dollars as well.
investment in its oil industry.
gets a few bucks, as does
gets relaxed immigration status.
These and other deals add up to about $50 billion of our
tax dollars going into this payola fund, to buy votes to support an unpopular
war. But in reality, what Bush has
bought with our stolen dollars, is not support for a war, but the undermining of
world government – with the UN degenerating into an American model of
“democracy,” where the top spenders usually win the elections.
Of course, why would Bush pursue any other form of persuasion – this is
the only form of government he and his cronies understand.
And it’s the model of government by capital (not to be confused with
capitalism) that they want to impose on the world.
Dr. Michael I. Niman’s previous columns are archived
online at http://mediastudy.com.
Recent columns are also available in PDF book form at
to Articles Index